Home » Items tagged with 'Napoleonic Wars'

Items tagged with 'Napoleonic Wars'

Article: ‘Pause, Reader, Pause’

A familiar strategy of elegy, anagnorisis is a form of teaching or guiding readers to a deep understanding of the poem’s subject through gradual, symbolic imagery and allusion. This paper argues that the spatial construction of the printed page became part of a new mode to gradually teach Romantic readers in the midst of a twenty-year conflict how to properly morn. Not only does spatial construction, as I define it, consist of the interplay of topic and genre on the periodical page, but its building blocks include intricate stanza shifts, locative words, and a collective voice. Mary Robinson’s ‘Stanzas supposed to be written near a tree, over the grave of an officer, who was killed at Lincelles, in Flanders, in August 1793’—despite its precise title—locates the act of mourning in the physical space of the poem. Her changing addresses and pronouns repeatedly tell readers and the gravesite itself what to do ‘Here’ so that correct acts are ‘record[ed]’ for future generations. Thus, I argue that the aim of such texts is to teach active mourning instead of effusion or meditation on personal loss. Active mourning typically consists of an obligation to the living, attention to ‘recording’ via the printed page, and close reading which is likened to travel. Such construction is reconsidered at the end of the long conflicts between Britain and France by critically overlooked poet Jane Alice Sargant. Her ‘Monody’ abruptly shifts from a meditation on death to a living, speaking ‘Warrior’ who finds a gravesite despite ‘no sculptur’d marble’ to mark it. Sargant’s text implies that ‘This mournful spot’ can only be found through the act of reading. The paper treats these two poems by Robinson and Sargant, respectively, with brief comparisons to other, anonymous periodical poems and to Keats’s ‘Chapman’s Homer’. Continue reading

Article: ‘Start not, gentle reader!’

This article is the first to focus upon Helen Monteagle (1818), a novel written by Alicia LeFanu and the second of six works of fiction she is known to have published between 1816 and 1826. In part an act of recovery, the article explores Helen Monteagle’s significance to understandings of the development of prose fiction in the romantic period, and situates the novel in relation to the traditions and innovations of satirical writing in particular. Tracing the various acts of conformity and resistance displayed by its female protagonists, the article identifies in the novel a corresponding interest in the terms of women’s professional practice as performers and authors in a year which also saw publication of Shelley’s Frankenstein and Austen’s Northanger Abbey. LeFanu’s novel, the article argues, reflects upon the author/creator and her audience, and articulates a commentary upon the adequacy of conventional narrative frameworks in the context of market competition and anxieties about the integrity of contemporary literary culture. The novel’s innovative and allusive approach to plot and character are examined in relation to LeFanu’s third novel of 1819, entitled Leolin Abbey. In its discussion of the various personal, professional and commercial imperatives which informed LeFanu’s career as a writer, the article reflects upon the broader context of women’s writing in this period and aims to enhance an appreciation of its diversity. Continue reading

Categories