Download full ArticleDownload »

James Grande »

James Grande is Senior Lecturer in Eighteenth-Century Literature and Culture at King’s College London. He is the author of William Cobbett, the Press and Rural England: Radicalism and the Fourth Estate, 1792–1835 (2014) and co-editor of The Opinions of William Cobbett (2013), William Cobbett, Romanticism and the Enlightenment: Contexts and Legacy (2015) and William Hazlitt: The Spirit of Controversy and Other Essays (2021). He is a trustee of Keats–Shelley House, Rome and editor of the Keats–Shelley Review.

Copyright Information

This article is © 2022 The Author and is the result of the independent labour of the scholar credited with authorship. Unless otherwise noted, the material contained in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) International License.
Date of acceptance: 9 December 2019.

Referring to this Article

J. GRANDE. ‘Reading Frankenstein in 1818: From Climate Change to Popular Sovereignty’, Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840, 24 (Winter 2021)

Online: Internet (date accessed): https://www.romtext.org.uk/articles/reading-frankenstein-in-1818/
PDF DOI:10.18573/romtext.103

Reading Frankenstein in 1818

From Climate Change to Popular Sovereignty

27 June 2023

Abstract Abstract

Abstract: 1818, the year of Frankenstein’s first publication, is a frequently overlooked context for Mary Shelley’s novel, overshadowed as it is both by Frankenstein’s afterlives and by the moment of its first conception in Switzerland, 1816, the ‘Year Without a Summer’. What might it mean for a novel that has transcended literary history and achieved mythic status to be re-situated as one of the novels of 1818? The article considers recent topics of critical interest, including ecocritical readings of the novel in the shadow of Mount Tambora and the topicality of the frame narrative in relation to histories of arctic exploration, before focusing on the politics of Frankenstein. Many critics have read the novel as a belated allegory of the French Revolution, which leads inexorably towards an interpretation of Frankenstein as an anti-revolutionary fiction. For the readers of 1818, however, it is the unfolding events of post-Waterloo Britain, not the French Revolution, that constitutes the primary political context, producing a more open-ended and radical text. The final section of the article reads the novel in dialogue with William Hazlitt’s essay, ‘What Is the People?’, showing how both texts engage with questions agitated by the popular reform movement, including responses to tyranny and the sovereignty of the people.

Tags

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

View Fullscreen